No, Pablo Iglesias, electromagnetic hypersensitivity does not exist

No, Pablo Iglesias, electromagnetic hypersensitivity does not exist

MEPs Pablo Iglesias and Stephanie Torres ask the European Union to recognize electromagnetic hypersensitivity, a nonexistent disease. We tell you what science says.

In early summer, Pablo Iglesias and Stephanie Torres recorded before the European Parliament a request for the European Union recognize the electromagnetic hypersensitivity . The question had gone unnoticed until today, when it has become front page of Digg.

MEPs, members of the Confederal Group of the European United Left / Nordic Green Left (GUE-NGL), requested the Commission’s “comprehensive recognition of electrohipersensibilidad (EHS) in Europe,” alluding to a hypothetical “child vulnerability and vulnerability” to the Wi-Fi networks of schools. The full text of the paper presented by Pablo Churches and Stephanie Torres was as follows:

Last June 24 was held a year the International Day against Electromagnetic Pollution. In this sense, both the European Parliament (2008 and 2009), like other estates -the European Environment Agency (since 2007 to present) or the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (in 2015) – have developed successive resolutions. However, protectionist lobbies have boycotted opinion in defense of health claims including wake-up calls and included in the resolutions referred to above and the basic recognition of the rights of the people in the EESC electro. This is currently being investigated by the Ombudsperson in case it was producing a conflict of interest. Also, the scientific committees, as the SCENIHR have an obvious lack of independence and neutrality. Will the Commission take steps to address such a boycott will, and to address the lack of protection and children’s vulnerability to the deployment of wireless technologies in education?

Does the phenomenon of hypersensitivity electromagnetic? Are we being contaminated by electromagnetic fields, as seems to assume the leading You can ? The evidence accumulated so far is very clear: this supposed disease exists only in the imagination of those who ignore fundamental principles of physics .

The electromagnetic spectrum

According to the Scientific Committee Unión European , the electromagnetic spectrum is the “set of all wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation.” Although the term “electromagnetic radiation” may seem dangerous, it is certain that encompasses radiation ranging from visible light to microwaves, X-rays or ultraviolet radiation. The radiation from mobile or Wi-Fi is nonionizing

In addition, different types of electromagnetic radiation that can meet differ depending on the wavelength they present. A shorter wavelength, more energy and be dangerous. In other words, radiation with longer wavelength will be less frequent and less dangerous, as in the case of radio waves, microwaves, infrared radiation, visible light and ultraviolet radiation.

electromagnetic hypersensitivity

Why do we say that is” less dangerous “? PE specialists called radiación ionizing to those types of radiation that are able to ionize matter, interacting with our DNA and causing the occurrence of cancer. Ionizing radiation, therefore, can be of two types: electromagnetic radiation (such as X rays and gamma rays) or particles constituted by (. Alpha, beta, neutrons, etc.)

As seen in the previous image, the radiation emitted by mobile phones or Wi-Fi networks is nonionizing , and therefore does not damage our health. But these electromagnetic fields can harm us in any way? Why then speak of electromagnetic hypersensitivity

There is no cause-effect relationship

In 2006, a report published by the Organización electromagnetic hypersensitivity described as “a phenomenon in which patients experienced adverse health effects while used or they were close to devices that emit electrical, magnetic or electromagnetic fields. ” Five years later, the Social Court number 24 of Madrid gave the work incapacity . a worker from the Complutense University of Madrid which stated to be afflicted by this disorder

Science, however, works in a complex way: we propose hypotheses and experiments and studies that prove or disprove our ideas. It is what is known as scientific method , which has also been applied in the investigation of the alleged electromagnetic hypersensitivity, not responding to the whim or the pilgrim trial of a particular institution.

A study published in 2013 in the journal Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine attributed to a psychological cause the appearance of patients electrohipersensibilidad by Pablo Iglesias complaint now. Another study, released in 2015 in the journal Bioelectromagnetics pointed a similar conclusion: there was no causal relationship between the discomfort experienced by some individuals and exposure to electromagnetic fields. The symptoms are the result of a psychosomatic effect

Among the effects manifested by patients who claim to have electromagnetic hypersensitivity, we can find symptoms such as fatigue, tiredness, burning sensation, heart palpitations, nausea or lack of concentration. But if the World Health Organization has not found a cause-effect relationship between the radiation of mobile phones and Wi-Fi networks and these symptoms , why these patients suffer from these problems?

A mere psychosomatic effect

One possibility is that the mere fact speak of “electromagnetic hypersensitivity” predisposes us to suffer its effects. As reported in Journal of Psychosomatic Research , “the more we heard about it in the media, the easier it was that “we suffer” symptoms related to this phenomenon. ” Another study, published in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society , found that “patients diagnosed with electromagnetic hypersensitivity not receive the radiation emitted by the better than healthy individuals smartphones”.

The findings of epidemiological research over two decades, such as INTERPHONE study , they showed that radiation from mobile phones was not associated with brain tumors. They also found no evidence of the danger of radiation emitted by Wi-Fi or smartphones entities such as Sociedad American Cancer , Cancer Research UK , International Institute Epidemiology, the Consejo Netherlands Health or Agencia French Health Safety, Environmental and Occupational .

 electromagnetic hypersensitivity

Marjan Lazarevski (Flickr)

The scientific evidence accumulated with the passage of time seems to show that the electromagnetic radiation emitted by phones or Wi-Fi networks is not dangerous . Symptoms experienced by certain people seem to be produced by a simple psychosomatic phenomenon, which gets worse the more we hear about this.

In the press conference held yesterday by Pablo Iglesias, as told The Spanish , the leader of Podemos said He has devoted much of their vacation to watch shows like House of Cards . We do not know if the question arose Parliament after seeing a chapter of Better Call Saul , the series in which Saul’s brother also suffers from electromagnetic hypersensitivity, the fact is that research has ruled out any kind relationship between this phenomenon and radiation Wi-Fi or mobile phones. It is the less frustrating than, as in the case of homeopathy , prefer to flirt with political problems fiction rather than be guided by scientific evidence.


Hipertextual

No, Pablo Iglesias, electromagnetic hypersensitivity does not exist
Source: english  
August 26, 2015


Next Random post