The surprising list of the players most and least profitable of Hollywood in the last four decades

Most recent:
  • ‘Crisis on Infinite Earths’ will also have the Lois Lane for ‘Smallville’ Erica Durance joins the crossover Arrowverso
  • The suspect in the attack on the servers of WoW Classic has been arrested
  • Mophie announces a new charger adjustable wireless
    San Sebastian 2019: 'The decision' is a tender celebration of life supported by a great cast


    Brad Pitt and Emilio Estevez

    Hidden among the vast amount of articles on the current state of the movie industry and television, most recently focused in the scandalous cases of sexual abuse, I called attention to a curious list that seeks to clarify who you are the actors most and least profitable Hollywood in the last four decades. The results are quite surprising.

    Variety echoes of an analysis that has taken into account the figures from the box office from 1980 to 2017 of all the performers who took part in at least ten films. In this way, it has been discovered that Emilio Estevez the actor is more productive for the industry while Brad Pitt is the least profitable of all.

    Martin Sheen with his children: Emilio Estevez, Ramon Estevez, Charlie Sheen and Renee Estevez Martin Sheen with his children: Emilio Estevez, Ramon Estevez, Charlie Sheen and Renee Estevez

    Estevez, who besides acting has also been dedicated to the direction —’Wisdom’ (1987), ‘Bobby’ (2006)—, tops the ranking, because generated by 6.7 for every dollar that is spent in one of his films. With 55 years, his big moment was in the 80’s, where they rolled ‘Rebels’ (‘The Outsiders’, 1983) or ‘The club of the five’ (‘The Breakfast Club’, 1985); in the last decade we are seeing less, not leads the cast of a film released in theaters since ‘The way’ (‘The Way’, 2010), created by himself.

    Interestingly, the following actors more cost-effective in all these years they are Jean-Claude Van Damme with 4.2 million dollars, Mel Gibson 3.5 and Tyler Perry and Dudley Moore tied with the $ 3 each. In the list opposite we have Pitt, which only generates 10 cents on the dollar, Johnny Depp with with$ 0.20 , Robert de Niro with 0,24$ , Hugh Jackman$ 0.25 and Anthony Hopkins with 0.26$ . The more you charge, the less benefits are the studies, it is normal, although I suppose that there are stars who have earned more money that De Niro and Hopkins.

    Brad Pitt and Anthony Hopkins in do you Know Joe Black?

    I Hope that some Hollywood executive read this listing and call Estevez, Van Damme and Gibson to make a movie together, they would have my ticket secured. Another curious fact of this study is that the films “mystery” are the most cost effective, generating box-office 39,89$ for every dollar invested; it is followed by the terror (34,13$ ) and thrillers (17,36$ ) while the action movies (1,89$ ), dramas (criminal 2,01$ ) and the musical (2,05$ ) have been the genres least productive in four decades. So it has more merit in what Van Damme!

    we Also recommend

    No one wins more than Markie Mark: these are the 20 highest paid actors in 2017

    'war Machine', Brad Pitt fails to save the new Netflix movie

    Tell me what you’re going to see tonight and I will tell you what audio system you want to


    The news The surprising list of the players most and least profitable of Hollywood in the last four decades was originally published in Espinof by Juan Luis Caviaro .


    Espinof

    The surprising list of the players most and least profitable of Hollywood in the last four decades
    Source: www.vayatele.com  
    October 24, 2017

    Next Random post